Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials · Indiana

Michigan City

Michigan City, IN · ~203 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan City runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials workplace, earning a grade A.

Michigan City: 0.6 TCR = 29% of Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan City safety composite

Michigan City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Michigan City: 0.9 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.6× in 2024

Michigan City's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423330 · Michigan City, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #1/21
  • PHOTO Duro-Last Roofing (MI)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~203 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Duro-Last Roofing (MI) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Michigan City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan City averages 0.6 TCR (29% of the Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan City TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Michigan City falls in its industry

953 Wholesale Distribution of Roof establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 21 Wholesale Distribution of Roof employers in Indiana.

Michigan City (203 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan City
Michigan City (203 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7

Michigan City has more employees than the Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 0.6 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.9 0.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423330 · IN · Michigan City

953 Wholesale Distribution of Roofing Siding and Insulation Materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 111 employers in Michigan City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Duro-Last Roofing (MI) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 402 - CHARLOTTE BRANCH 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CALUMET CITY 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 601 - HIGHWAY 6 BRANCH 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GEMCO Constructors LLC 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danzer Veneer Americas 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN012 Richmond (G Street) Container 203 FTE
STATE-SIZE IN182 Richmond (Industries Road) Container 203 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franciscan Health Michigan City 938 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Chip Casino Hotel Spa 772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan City High School 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods Solutions 602 FTE
NAT-TCR Lombard 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Packaging Inc Port Allen LA 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Telamon Corporation - Dayton 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Affairs Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE X-Act Finish & Trim, Inc. 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Modular Inc 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knutson Construction Minneapolis 203 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piedmont Clinic 203 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.