Precision turned product manufacturing · New York

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc.

Newark, NY · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Precision turned product manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 124% of Precision turned product manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. safety composite

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2016→2024

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. injury rate improved

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc.'s TCR fell 9.2 from 9.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332721 · Newark, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 124% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/31
  • PHOTO dow circle
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: dow circle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (124% of the Precision turned product manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. falls in its industry

464 Precision turned product manuf establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 31 Precision turned product manuf employers in New York.

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Micro-Tech Machine, Inc.
Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Micro-Tech Machine, Inc. has fewer employees than the Precision turned product manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 6.8 4.5 3 0 0
2017 4.9 4.9 1 1 0
2016 9.2 4.6 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332721 · NY · Newark

464 Precision turned product manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 34 employers in Newark, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR dow circle 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR YOUNG ENGINEERS, INC., THE 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR H&L Tool Company Inc 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NSK Precision America 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sandy Knoll Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY State Solar Farmingdale 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Facilities 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE RICHTER+RATNER CONTRACTING CORP 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newark Wayne Community Hosp/DeMay Long Term 836 FTE
CITY-NEAR Creation Technologies 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Newark 006 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1813 255 FTE
NAT-TCR Performance Transportation Corp. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Companies, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR South Central MO CAA 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Orange County REMC 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waste Industries Morristown TN 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pepsi-Cola of McComb 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shiloh Paving and Excavating, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialty Feeds, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.