Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · California

Microform Precision, LLC

Sacramento, CA · ~50 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Microform Precision, LLC runs at 332% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Microform Precision, LLC: 11.0 TCR = 332% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Microform Precision, LLC safety composite

Microform Precision, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2017→2024

Microform Precision, LLC injury rate improved

Microform Precision, LLC's TCR fell 4.9 from 8.9 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 39.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.9 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=39.5 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 332% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #91/98
  • PHOTO Kemlee Manufacturing…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kemlee Manufacturing Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Microform Precision, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Microform Precision, LLC averages 11.0 TCR (332% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Microform Precision, LLC TCR series: 2017=8.9 · 2018=8.5 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=39.5 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Microform Precision, LLC falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #91 safest of 98 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in California.

Microform Precision, LLC (50 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Microform Precision, LLC
Microform Precision, LLC (50 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Microform Precision, LLC has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 39.5 37.5 2 18 0
2021 11.8 11.8 4 2 0
2020 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2019 8.3 6.2 4 0 0
2018 8.5 8.5 4 0 0
2017 8.9 6.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · Sacramento

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kemlee Manufacturing Inc 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rapid-Line Inc. 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lukjan Metal Products, Inc 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caprock Metal Works Inc 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Paint facility 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ICCS - Pueblo 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairborn OH 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Joseph Living Center 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE World Data Products 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Museum of York County 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goley, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alta Enterprises LLC- Byron Center 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.