Commercial building construction general contractors · Maryland

Mid Atlantic Contracting

Woodbine, MD · ~56 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid Atlantic Contracting runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Mid Atlantic Contracting: 0.8 TCR = 26% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid Atlantic Contracting safety composite

Mid Atlantic Contracting scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mid Atlantic Contracting held a steady TCR band

Mid Atlantic Contracting's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Woodbine, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/99
  • PHOTO Chicago - Clune Cons…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chicago - Clune Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Mid Atlantic Contracting in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid Atlantic Contracting averages 0.8 TCR (26% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid Atlantic Contracting TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Mid Atlantic Contracting falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 99 Commercial building constructi employers in Maryland.

Mid Atlantic Contracting (56 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid Atlantic Contracting
Mid Atlantic Contracting (56 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Mid Atlantic Contracting has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Woodbine

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Woodbine, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chicago - Clune Construction Company 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pav-Lak Contracting, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR H.M. KERN CORPORATION 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7017138 - FIS Renovation & Expansion 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Empower Energies LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE WMS 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walls & Ceilings, Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis Contractors 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02611 - STORE # 2611 WOODBINE 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chapel Valley Landscape - Woodbine 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2611 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR D & D DRILLING, INC. 39 FTE
NAT-TCR H.M. Kern Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CORP-VTA-CORPORATE 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gratr Landscapes, LTD 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Neal Manufacturing Services Houston 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Jig and Fixture Inc 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dawn Food Products - San Francisco Distribution 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Chemtex Corporation 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE State Agricultural and Mechanical Society of South Carolina 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.