Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Pennsylvania

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc.

Carlisle, PA · ~30 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 126% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. safety composite

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc.: 0.0 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Carlisle, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 126% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/54
  • PHOTO C.B. Utility Co., Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C.B. Utility Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (126% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=10 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 54 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Pennsylvania.

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc.
Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.0 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2019 7.3 3.6 2 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · PA · Carlisle

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 165 employers in Carlisle, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C.B. Utility Co., Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoerr Costruction, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chalfont 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Basset Engineering Inc 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade Maytown 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE BJE Poultry 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Energy Resources, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Patriot, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp Office Carlisle PA 1,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR DB Schenker--Carlisle 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCM 984 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACAS - CARLISLE 902 FTE
NAT-TCR Strongwell-Highlands Division 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Waterberry Lodging Company 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gretna Operations LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR United Mechanical, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE DeCook Landscaping, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reactive Downhole Tools LTD 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clean Scapes - Houston LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowman Constructors 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.