Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Kansas

Mid-Continent Aviation Services

Wichita, KS · ~25 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid-Continent Aviation Services runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade B.

Mid-Continent Aviation Services: 2.9 TCR = 63% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid-Continent Aviation Services safety composite

Mid-Continent Aviation Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mid-Continent Aviation Services held a steady TCR band

Mid-Continent Aviation Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/15
  • PHOTO Crestview
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crestview (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Mid-Continent Aviation Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid-Continent Aviation Services averages 2.9 TCR (63% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid-Continent Aviation Services TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Mid-Continent Aviation Services falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 15 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Kansas.

Mid-Continent Aviation Services (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid-Continent Aviation Services
Mid-Continent Aviation Services (25 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Mid-Continent Aviation Services has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · KS · Wichita

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crestview 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SW-20730039-MX IAH - HOUSTON INTERCONT., TX - SW 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 089B - C-21 SCOTT AFB, IL 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AeroRepair Corp NH 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE ILS Farm Partnership 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOW 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE J-Six Farms-Summit 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paola Service Center 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR Schetter Electric LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Opelika 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stanley Infrastructure 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GLASSLINE 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Electrical Construction 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nursery 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walkabout Orthotics & Prosthetics 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marine Industrial Fabrication 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.