Bridge, tunnel, and highway operations · New York

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance)

Highland, NY · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bridge, tunnel, and highway operations workplace, earning a grade C.

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance): 3.7 TCR = 82% of Bridge, tunnel, and highway operations BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) safety composite

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2021→2024

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) injury rate improved

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance)'s TCR fell 7.0 from 7.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.0 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488490 · Highland, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/18
  • PHOTO Gold Medal Logistics
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gold Medal Logistics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) averages 3.7 TCR (82% of the Bridge, tunnel, and highway operations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) TCR series: 2021=7 · 2022=7.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) falls in its industry

370 Bridge, tunnel, and highway op establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 18 Bridge, tunnel, and highway op employers in New York.

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) (26 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance)
Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) (26 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Mid-Hudson (Command Center/Maintenance) has fewer employees than the Bridge, tunnel, and highway operations median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.8 3.9 0 2 0
2021 7.0 7.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488490 · NY · Highland

370 Bridge, tunnel, and highway operations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 21 employers in Highland, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gold Medal Logistics 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR I-66 Express Mobility Partners 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RHE 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgeport USG 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Volles Dairy Farm, LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Mushroom Blvd 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Fillmore 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookfield Renewable - Fulton 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tee Bar Corp 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08341 - Store # 8341 Highland 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hudson Valley Rehabilitation & Extended Care Center 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Selux Corporation 147 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MEM1 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ICAN Inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Physical Therapy Texas (15160 BIR Ft. Worth Day Neuro Hub) 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyattsville MD Yard 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jardin Botanico y Cultural William Miranda Marin 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elite Logistix - Legacy Park Facility 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Demeter Millwork, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Littleton 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.