Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard · Ohio

Mid-States Packaging Inc.

Lewistown, OH · ~66 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid-States Packaging Inc. runs at 465% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

Mid-States Packaging Inc.: 15.4 TCR = 465% of Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid-States Packaging Inc. safety composite

Mid-States Packaging Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.0

2016→2024

Mid-States Packaging Inc. injury rate improved

Mid-States Packaging Inc.'s TCR fell 9.0 from 17.7 in 2016 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.7 · 2017=14.1 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=16.5 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=16.0 · 2023=20.4 · 2024=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Lewistown, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 465% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/19
  • PHOTO ColorKraft Roll Prod…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ColorKraft Roll Products (2.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Mid-States Packaging Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid-States Packaging Inc. averages 15.4 TCR (465% of the Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid-States Packaging Inc. TCR series: 2016=17.7 · 2017=14.1 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=16.5 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=16.3 · 2022=16 · 2023=20.4 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Mid-States Packaging Inc. falls in its industry

236 Die-cut paper products (except establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 19 Die-cut paper products (except employers in Ohio.

Mid-States Packaging Inc. (66 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid-States Packaging Inc.
Mid-States Packaging Inc. (66 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Mid-States Packaging Inc. has more employees than the Die-cut paper products (except for offic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 0.0 4 0 0
2023 20.4 6.1 10 0 0
2022 16.0 5.3 9 0 0
2021 16.3 4.9 9 1 0
2020 14.7 14.7 6 1 0
2019 16.5 16.5 12 0 0
2018 13.9 12.4 9 0 0
2017 14.1 10.5 8 0 0
2016 17.7 11.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · OH · Lewistown

236 Die-cut paper products (except for office use) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ColorKraft Roll Products 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pap-R Products (Martinsville) 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6870_15804 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fibercel Packaging Portville 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poultry Service Associates Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowling Green 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGQ, Inc. 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE ENGIE North America - OSU 66 FTE
NAT-TCR Island Lake Rcrtn Area - Dnr 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mcbeth Transportation LLC 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kraiburg Holding 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MediLodge of Greenview 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tailored Chemical Products, Inc. - Plant 2 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bell Intermediate Academy 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tulsa Tube Bending 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE DePinho Roofing, Inc. 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.