Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing · North Dakota

Mid States Truss

Fargo, ND · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mid States Truss runs at 776% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Mid States Truss: 25.6 TCR = 776% of Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mid States Truss safety composite

Mid States Truss scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−35.7

2018→2024

Mid States Truss injury rate improved

Mid States Truss's TCR fell 35.7 from 39.9 in 2018 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 39.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=39.9 · 2019=23.9 · 2020=38.8 · 2021=37.4 · 2022=20.4 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Fargo, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.6 · 776% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Lakes Building Compo…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lakes Building Components (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Mid States Truss in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mid States Truss averages 25.6 TCR (776% of the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mid States Truss TCR series: 2018=39.9 · 2019=23.9 · 2020=38.8 · 2021=37.4 · 2022=20.4 · 2023=14.8 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Mid States Truss falls in its industry

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m employers in North Dakota.

Mid States Truss (31 employees, TCR 25.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Mid States Truss
Mid States Truss (31 employees, TCR 25.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Mid States Truss has fewer employees than the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2023 14.8 11.1 4 0 0
2022 20.4 20.4 7 0 0
2021 37.4 37.4 7 5 0
2020 38.8 38.8 7 4 0
2019 23.9 23.9 10 0 0
2018 39.9 25.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · ND · Fargo

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 415 employers in Fargo, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lakes Building Components 25.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eugene Branch Office 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Components, Inc. 26.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Structural Components, Inc. 24.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Continental Resources - Watford City, ND 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Dakota Operations Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCI - Construction Sites 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,963 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,FARGO - Fargo Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 2,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Fargo-Broadway Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,547 FTE
NAT-TCR 98 - Fridley 25.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Redtails Logistics Corporation Inc 25.6 TCR
NAT-TCR J.B. Garage Doors Inc. 25.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sat Nam Express, LLC 25.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Family First Companion Care 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dort Steel Services 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adams Bros. Concrete Products LTD. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE HTT Sheboygan Falls 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.