Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming · Illinois

Middle Creek Swine, LLC.

Carthage, IL · ~19 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. runs at 537% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming workplace, earning a grade F.

Middle Creek Swine, LLC.: 24.2 TCR = 537% of Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. safety composite

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.4

2016→2023

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. injury rate improved

Middle Creek Swine, LLC.'s TCR fell 12.4 from 29.4 in 2016 to 17.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 102.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=29.4 · 2017=102.9 · 2018=43.2 · 2019=15.4 · 2022=15.7 · 2023=17.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112210 · Carthage, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.2 · 537% of ind

  • DART 11.4 DART
  • RANK #28/28
  • PHOTO Smiling Porker
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smiling Porker (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Middle Creek Swine, LLC. averages 24.2 TCR (537% of the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. TCR series: 2016=29.4 · 2017=102.9 · 2018=43.2 · 2019=15.4 · 2022=15.7 · 2023=17.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Middle Creek Swine, LLC. falls in its industry

280 Hog and pig (including breedin establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 28 Hog and pig (including breedin employers in Illinois.

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. (19 employees, TCR 24.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Middle Creek Swine, LLC.
Middle Creek Swine, LLC. (19 employees, TCR 24.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7

Middle Creek Swine, LLC. has fewer employees than the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 17.1 11.4 2 1 0
2022 15.7 5.2 3 0 0
2019 15.4 3.9 4 0 0
2018 43.2 8.6 10 0 0
2017 102.9 17.9 23 0 0
2016 29.4 4.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112210 · IL · Carthage

280 Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 11 employers in Carthage, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smiling Porker 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastwood Sow Unit 23.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwood Sow Unit 25.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deer View, LLC. 23.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gingerich Farms Partnerships 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tolono Research 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE PharmaCann Hillcrest 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Morgan Acres, LLC. 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hancock County Senior Services 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Market #287 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bear Creek Genetics, LLC. 31 FTE
NAT-TCR GranVida Senior Living and Memory Care 24.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt House Anaheim 24.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0350 Salt Lake City 24.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Maplewood at Twinsburg 24.1 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.