Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste · New Jersey

Middlesex Plant

Middlesex, NJ · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Middlesex Plant runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste workplace, earning a grade C.

Middlesex Plant: 2.3 TCR = 87% of Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Middlesex Plant safety composite

Middlesex Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Middlesex Plant: 3.6 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Middlesex Plant's TCR rose 0.5 from 3.6 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562211 · Middlesex, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO TES Bridgeport Facil…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TES Bridgeport Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Middlesex Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Middlesex Plant averages 2.3 TCR (87% of the Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Middlesex Plant TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=4 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=1 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Middlesex Plant falls in its industry

211 Hazardous waste treatment faci establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Hazardous waste treatment faci employers in New Jersey.

Middlesex Plant (52 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Middlesex Plant
Middlesex Plant (52 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Middlesex Plant has more employees than the Hazardous waste treatment facilities com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 2 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.6 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562211 · NJ · Middlesex

211 Hazardous waste treatment facilities combined with collection and/or local hauling of hazardous waste employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 25 employers in Middlesex, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TES Bridgeport Facility 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tradebe Environmental Services - Bridgeport Facility 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Harbors Wilmington LLC 67WI 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Earth of North Jersey, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lynmar Builders 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Medical Construction 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jocama Construction Corp 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied telecom corp 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Impax Laboratories Inc. Middlesex 269 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAMCO inc. 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DNK7 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schifano Construction Corp. 88 FTE
NAT-TCR South Bay CA Home Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mill Creek 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tumbleweed Sow Farm -Est 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Peachtree City 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orca, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0177 Ahwatukee 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culpeper VA Panel 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammond Lumber Company - Portland 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.