Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire · Ohio

Midmark - Leesburg

Leesburg, OH · ~123 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midmark - Leesburg runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire workplace, earning a grade D.

Midmark - Leesburg: 6.3 TCR = 189% of Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midmark - Leesburg safety composite

Midmark - Leesburg scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.4

2019→2024

Midmark - Leesburg injury rate improved

Midmark - Leesburg's TCR fell 11.4 from 14.1 in 2019 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332618 · Leesburg, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 189% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #13/18
  • PHOTO Lake Cable of Indian…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lake Cable of Indiana LLC - Valpo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Midmark - Leesburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midmark - Leesburg averages 6.3 TCR (189% of the Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midmark - Leesburg TCR series: 2019=14.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=1 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Midmark - Leesburg falls in its industry

270 Chain link fencing and fence g establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 18 Chain link fencing and fence g employers in Ohio.

Midmark - Leesburg (123 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Midmark - Leesburg
Midmark - Leesburg (123 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Midmark - Leesburg has more employees than the Chain link fencing and fence gates made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2023 6.9 2.3 6 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 8.8 4.9 9 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2019 14.1 9.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332618 · OH · Leesburg

270 Chain link fencing and fence gates made from purchased wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 employers in Leesburg, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lake Cable of Indiana LLC - Valpo 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Archer Wire International Bedford Park 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana Materials Processing 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perfection Chain Products, Inc 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Relief 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strawser Central Construction Supervision 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oglesby Construction - Ohio 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Candle-lite, Company 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mason Business Acquisition 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fillmore Construction LLC 48 FTE
NAT-TCR New Prague Early Childhood Center 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Killingly 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Queens Univ 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Work Skills Corporation Ann Arbor 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Fernando VL CA FXFE-SFV 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Burbank - Parks and Recreation - Community Service Centers/Cultural/Sp Programs 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swamp Rabbit Cafe and Grocery 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE 524 - Bedford 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.