Machine bases, metal, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication

Reeseville, WI · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication runs at 396% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Machine bases, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication: 13.1 TCR = 396% of Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication safety composite

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2020

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication injury rate improved

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication's TCR fell 2.2 from 20.0 in 2016 to 17.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=14.4 · 2020=17.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Reeseville, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 396% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #67/73
  • PHOTO Headquarters
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Headquarters (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest General Repair and Fabrication averages 13.1 TCR (396% of the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication TCR series: 2016=20 · 2017=0 · 2018=14.4 · 2020=17.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Midwest General Repair and Fabrication falls in its industry

827 Machine bases, metal, manufact establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 73 Machine bases, metal, manufact employers in Wisconsin.

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication (26 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest General Repair and Fabrication
Midwest General Repair and Fabrication (26 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Midwest General Repair and Fabrication has fewer employees than the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 17.9 0.0 1 4 0
2018 14.4 3.6 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 20.0 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · WI · Reeseville

827 Machine bases, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 4 employers in Reeseville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henderson 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGC OR (LOC CODE: AGCOR1) 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PTubes, Inc. 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WORZELLA & SONS, INC. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Grove Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ross Soil Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Specialty Cheese Company Inc 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caine Warehousing, LTD. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Welding and Manufacturing 21 FTE
NAT-TCR Union County Health & Rehab Center 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Elim Shores Independent and Assisted Living 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Children's Healthcare Center 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets Burien 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Management The Glenn Hopkins Terraces 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Valley Assisted Living & Memory Care 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marias Care Center 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators Columbus 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.