Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services · Indiana

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation

Griffith, IN · ~68 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation runs at 363% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation: 7.6 TCR = 363% of Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation safety composite

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation: 6.8 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2023

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation's TCR rose 1.6 from 6.8 in 2022 to 8.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Griffith, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 363% of ind

  • DART 8.4 DART
  • RANK #83/90
  • PHOTO Centurion Container …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Centurion Container South Holland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Midwest Refrigeration Corporation averages 7.6 TCR (363% of the Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation TCR series: 2022=6.8 · 2023=8.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Midwest Refrigeration Corporation falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equip establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 90 Commercial refrigeration equip employers in Indiana.

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation (68 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Midwest Refrigeration Corporation
Midwest Refrigeration Corporation (68 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Midwest Refrigeration Corporation has more employees than the Commercial refrigeration equipment repai median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.4 8.4 6 0 0
2022 6.8 6.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IN · Griffith

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 24 employers in Griffith, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Centurion Container South Holland 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equipment Solutions 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thomas Welding & Machine, Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-Atlantic : SVC-Wilkes-Barre PA-USA 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Patterson Horth, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eaton Mill 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana Plant 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawrence Building Corporation 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walsh & Kelly, Inc. - Corporate 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR 010 Corporate 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 010 Corporate Griffith IN 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR 001 Griffith IN 70 FTE
NAT-TCR Cassidys Ice 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Surprise, Az #00663 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Surgical Hosp at Swoods** 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Murphy Logistics Solutions - Eagan 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Welding 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fountain Parkway 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lewiston Transitional Care of Cascadia 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain Valley of Cascadia 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.