Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Milestone Senior Living Faribault

Faribault, MN · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Milestone Senior Living Faribault runs at 393% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Milestone Senior Living Faribault: 14.9 TCR = 393% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Milestone Senior Living Faribault safety composite

Milestone Senior Living Faribault scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.6

2019→2021

Milestone Senior Living Faribault injury rate improved

Milestone Senior Living Faribault's TCR fell 12.6 from 25.3 in 2019 to 12.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 25.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=25.3 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=12.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Faribault, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 393% of ind

  • DART 12.7 DART
  • RANK #187/226
  • PHOTO Lakeview Memory Care
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lakeview Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Milestone Senior Living Faribault in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Milestone Senior Living Faribault averages 14.9 TCR (393% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Milestone Senior Living Faribault TCR series: 2019=25.3 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=12.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Milestone Senior Living Faribault falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #187 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Milestone Senior Living Faribault (37 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Milestone Senior Living Faribault
Milestone Senior Living Faribault (37 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Milestone Senior Living Faribault has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.7 12.7 4 0 0
2020 6.8 3.4 2 0 0
2019 25.3 25.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Faribault

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 92 employers in Faribault, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lakeview Memory Care 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Lease Management LLC dtd Primrose of Austin 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Aspen Wind 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Pullman 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Betaseed Inc - Shakopee 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pals 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Support 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faribault Plant 736 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Correctional Facility-Faribault 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daikin Applied South 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faribault Foods LLC 452 FTE
NAT-TCR Whited Truck & Rv Center 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Home Care and Hospice 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Millers Merry Manor 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pocahontas Manor Care Center 14.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lake Park Service Center 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thrift Store-San Jose 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orender Golf Management 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeffersonville IN 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.