National Guard · Minnesota

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office

St Paul, MN · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical National Guard workplace, earning a grade B.

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office: 1.8 TCR = 57% of National Guard BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office safety composite

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2017→2023

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office injury rate improved

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 928110 · St Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO FL Army National Guard
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FL Army National Guard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office averages 1.8 TCR (57% of the National Guard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office falls in its industry

36 National Guard establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 National Guard employers in Minnesota.

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office (30 employees, TCR 1.8) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 17 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office
Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office (30 employees, TCR 1.8) among 16 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Military Affairs - The Adjutant General's Office has fewer employees than the National Guard median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

928110 · MN · St Paul

36 National Guard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FL Army National Guard 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virginia Army National Guard 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingsley Field Fire Dept 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ft Polk MSC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nelson Nursery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Plains Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Westland Dairy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Grow Finish 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Boyers Food Market Inc - 3555 - Elysburg 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1629 TONAWANDA, NY 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR HA Sack Company LLC Statesboro Georgia 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dalton Electric Htg Co., Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PetroSpecs, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilson's Machine Products Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoneville-US-Research 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg District Shop 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.