Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing · Alabama

Mill Steel Birmingham

Birmingham, AL · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mill Steel Birmingham runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Mill Steel Birmingham: 4.6 TCR = 139% of Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mill Steel Birmingham safety composite

Mill Steel Birmingham scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2016→2024

Mill Steel Birmingham injury rate improved

Mill Steel Birmingham's TCR fell 8.6 from 8.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.6 · 2018=7.9 · 2020=6.7 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326299 · Birmingham, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 139% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO United States Roller…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United States Roller Works, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Mill Steel Birmingham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mill Steel Birmingham averages 4.6 TCR (139% of the Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mill Steel Birmingham TCR series: 2016=8.6 · 2018=7.9 · 2020=6.7 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Mill Steel Birmingham falls in its industry

257 Rolls and roll coverings, rubb establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Rolls and roll coverings, rubb employers in Alabama.

Mill Steel Birmingham (38 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mill Steel Birmingham
Mill Steel Birmingham (38 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Mill Steel Birmingham has fewer employees than the Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2020 6.7 4.5 3 0 0
2018 7.9 4.0 2 0 0
2016 8.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326299 · AL · Birmingham

257 Rolls and roll coverings, rubber (e.g., industrial, papermill, painters', steelmill) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 840 employers in Birmingham, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United States Roller Works, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stowe Woodward LLC NH (Andritz) 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HEXPOL LONG BEACH 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Tire Recycling - Live Oak, FL 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milstead Farm Group, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Division Selma Office 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eufaula State Docks Road Complex 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mobile Division Schillingers Road 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR USD 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLASSIC FOODS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIRMINGHAM PACKERS 8,650 FTE
NAT-TCR Sheet Vinyl Plant 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Mill St - 546R 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WellStar Douglas Hospital 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lezzer Pennsdale 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pro-Fabrication, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moran Manor 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cole & Ashcroft - Houston 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Topa 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.