Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Pennsylvania

Miller Environmental, Inc.

Reading, PA · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miller Environmental, Inc. runs at 277% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Miller Environmental, Inc.: 3.3 TCR = 277% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miller Environmental, Inc. safety composite

Miller Environmental, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Miller Environmental, Inc.: 2.9 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2024

Miller Environmental, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 2.9 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.3 · 277% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Rialto
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rialto (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Miller Environmental, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miller Environmental, Inc. averages 3.3 TCR (277% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miller Environmental, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Miller Environmental, Inc. falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Pennsylvania.

Miller Environmental, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Miller Environmental, Inc.
Miller Environmental, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Miller Environmental, Inc. has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2023 7.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.3 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · PA · Reading

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rialto 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - Undine 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mayodan 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SpecialtyEgg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Mill & Fabricating Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS PA Fairless Hills 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Lowes Foods #151 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Weavexx, LLC (Andritz) 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Miller Electric Mfg. LLC - Main Plant 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FoodTown #005 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Poly Lift 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercer Construction Company 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Casework Systems 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Essex Concrete- Aylett Plant 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.