Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Indiana

Miller's Senior Living

Portage, IN · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miller's Senior Living runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Miller's Senior Living: 6.5 TCR = 172% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miller's Senior Living safety composite

Miller's Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2017→2024

Miller's Senior Living injury rate improved

Miller's Senior Living's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 25.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=13.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=25.8 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Portage, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 172% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #68/136
  • PHOTO Ridgeview Place
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ridgeview Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Miller's Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miller's Senior Living averages 6.5 TCR (172% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miller's Senior Living TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=13 · 2020=0 · 2021=25.8 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Miller's Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 136 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Miller's Senior Living (32 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Miller's Senior Living
Miller's Senior Living (32 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Miller's Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.6 8.6 0 1 0
2021 25.8 8.6 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.0 6.5 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Portage

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 87 employers in Portage, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ridgeview Place 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Song Assisted Living 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abernethy Laurels 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christian Health Care Corbin 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE R. Gallagher Generating Station 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper County REMC Headquarters 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana American Water-Northwest District Borman Park Water Treatment Plant 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Plant 889 FTE
CITY-NEAR Solid Platforms, Inc. 746 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2544 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2544 404 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ak Pride Rock 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shelbyville Plant 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR East Carroll Nursing Home dba Countryview Manor 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR FLO010 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eau Claire Insulation LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Konoike-E Street,Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE TORIN Products, Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panama City FL Yard 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.