Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · California

Millie and Severson Inc

Los Alamitos, CA · ~134 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Millie and Severson Inc runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade A.

Millie and Severson Inc: 0.8 TCR = 29% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Millie and Severson Inc safety composite

Millie and Severson Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2020→2023

Millie and Severson Inc injury rate improved

Millie and Severson Inc's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Los Alamitos, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #73/486
  • PHOTO FCL Builders Georgia…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FCL Builders Georgia, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Millie and Severson Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Millie and Severson Inc averages 0.8 TCR (29% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Millie and Severson Inc TCR series: 2020=2.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Millie and Severson Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 486 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in California.

Millie and Severson Inc (134 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Millie and Severson Inc
Millie and Severson Inc (134 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Millie and Severson Inc has more employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 1.7 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Los Alamitos

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 40 employers in Los Alamitos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FCL Builders Georgia, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCCo-KCI 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TCCo-NYC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sauer Construction, LLC 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE ag land inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capstone Ranch 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nissen Vineyard Services Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE H & C Ag, Inc. 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 152 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-169 1,155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arrowhead Products 780 FTE
CITY-NEAR Epson America 586 FTE
NAT-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-100 EAST MILLSDALE ROAD 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 019 Ulysses Ks 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CW & Sons Infrastructure, Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifecycle Construction Services, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Paper- Maysville Mill 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Cloud Medical Group Northwest 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legends Golf Course 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Filtration : Lancaster IGFG 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.