Weaving fabrics more than 12 inches (30cm) in width · South Carolina

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant

Pendleton, SC · ~165 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Weaving fabrics more than 12 inches (30cm) in width workplace, earning a grade A.

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Weaving fabrics more than 12 inches (30cm) in width BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant safety composite

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2019→2024

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant injury rate improved

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313210 · Pendleton, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/29
  • PHOTO Hexcel Seguin
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hexcel Seguin (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Weaving fabrics more than 12 inches (30cm) in width BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant falls in its industry

141 Weaving fabrics more than 12 i establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 29 Weaving fabrics more than 12 i employers in South Carolina.

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant (165 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 136 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant
Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant (165 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 136 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Milliken & Co. Gerrish Plant has more employees than the Weaving fabrics more than 12 inches (30c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313210 · SC · Pendleton

141 Weaving fabrics more than 12 inches (30cm) in width employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 13 employers in Pendleton, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hexcel Seguin 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MC SALES SERVICE 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milliken and Company Johnston Plant 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milliken - Pine Mountain Plant 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C150 Bishopville SAC 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Felt Co North Augusta 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Chemical 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2207 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arthrex Manufacturing South Carolina 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken & Co - Pendleton Finishing Plant 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken Pendleton Plant 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR BLS - Michelin 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Newtron Mechanical LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jv Industrial Companies Ltd 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO - Houston Service & Repair Facility 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valdosta GA FXFE-VLD 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phrg Hou 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Prague High School 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lendlease - Nashville Office 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.