Bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America

Milton, PA · ~100 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America: 4.6 TCR = 141% of Bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America safety composite

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2017

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America injury rate improved

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America's TCR fell 2.5 from 5.9 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.9 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Milton, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 141% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #35/91
  • PHOTO Bec-Don, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bec-Don, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America averages 4.6 TCR (141% of the Bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America falls in its industry

1,491 Bridge sections, prefabricated establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 91 Bridge sections, prefabricated employers in Pennsylvania.

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America (100 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America
Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America (100 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Milton Steel Company/Acrow Corporation of America has more employees than the Bridge sections, prefabricated metal, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.4 1.7 2 2 0
2016 5.9 2.4 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · PA · Milton

1,491 Bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 37 employers in Milton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bec-Don, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinninger Production Welding Co. Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Engineering Company 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Poseidon Barge - Fort Wayne 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kennett Square Specialties 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howard Concrete Pumping Company 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wallworks, Inc 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cost Company 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milton, PA 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Watsontown Trucking Company 544 FTE
CITY-NEAR 261 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 264 303 FTE
NAT-TCR 0199 - Brick, Nj 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-Swy 0035 3040 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Solutions : IS - SC - Evansville, IN, USA 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Husqvarna Forestry Products N.A. Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Joseph Health Center 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Christian Republic LLC 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Subaru Distributors Corp. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100680 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.