Individual and family social services, multi-purpose · Wisconsin

Milwaukee Center for Independence

Milwaukee, WI · ~442 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Milwaukee Center for Independence runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Individual and family social services, multi-purpose workplace, earning a grade B.

Milwaukee Center for Independence: 2.5 TCR = 65% of Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Milwaukee Center for Independence safety composite

Milwaukee Center for Independence scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Milwaukee Center for Independence: 0.3 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2024

Milwaukee Center for Independence's TCR rose 2.9 from 0.3 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Milwaukee, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 65% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #6/14
  • PHOTO Developmental Pathways
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~442 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Developmental Pathways (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Milwaukee Center for Independence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Milwaukee Center for Independence averages 2.5 TCR (65% of the Individual and family social services, multi-purpose BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Milwaukee Center for Independence TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2022=2 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Milwaukee Center for Independence falls in its industry

990 Individual and family social s establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 14 Individual and family social s employers in Wisconsin.

Milwaukee Center for Independence (442 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Milwaukee Center for Independence
Milwaukee Center for Independence (442 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Milwaukee Center for Independence has more employees than the Individual and family social services, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 1.7 9 2 0
2023 4.4 3.3 11 4 0
2022 2.0 0.9 7 0 0
2016 0.3 0.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · WI · Milwaukee

990 Individual and family social services, multi-purpose employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Developmental Pathways 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifeworks, Services, Inc Mankato 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PPOSBC - Orange 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Community Services 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Distribution Center (W1) 442 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vernon Memorial Healthcare 442 FTE
STATE-SIZE Curwood Inc 443 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2958 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR D.M. Sabia & Co., Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Birk Manufacturing Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR igus Bearings Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR EMS - Sanctuary Brooklyn Ctr 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Siemens Logistics 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cushman and Wakefield Bank of America Account 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Jacksonville Facility 442 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huron Inc 442 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.