Hotels (except casino hotels) · Wisconsin

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn

Milwaukee, WI · ~55 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade C.

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn: 3.0 TCR = 101% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn safety composite

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.7

2016→2024

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn injury rate improved

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn's TCR fell 13.7 from 13.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.7 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #81/203
  • PHOTO HGILM ASSOCIATES, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HGILM ASSOCIATES, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn averages 3.0 TCR (101% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn TCR series: 2016=13.7 · 2018=2 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 203 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Wisconsin.

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn (55 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn
Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn (55 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Milwaukee Hilton Garden Inn has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 0 1 0
2016 13.7 9.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · WI · Milwaukee

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HGILM ASSOCIATES, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Express & Suites TH 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holiday Inn Chicago North Evanston 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courtyard Colorado Springs North 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Siemers Holstein Farm, Inc. - Main Farm 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Substation 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luamben Green Service Corp 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE KOHLER SERVICE ORGANIZATION 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Knapp Concrete Contractors, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RW Setterlin Building Company 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairbanks 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ruston Paving Co., Inc - Greensboro, NC 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma City Hilton Garden Inn 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeRoyal Technologies 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chem Plants 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE BHJ - St. Joseph 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.