Boxed beef produced in slaughtering plants · Wisconsin

Milwaukee Plant

Milwaukee, WI · ~167 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Milwaukee Plant runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxed beef produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Milwaukee Plant: 6.2 TCR = 189% of Boxed beef produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Milwaukee Plant safety composite

Milwaukee Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2024

Milwaukee Plant injury rate improved

Milwaukee Plant's TCR fell 5.8 from 7.0 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #9/13
  • PHOTO CS Beef Packers
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CS Beef Packers (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Milwaukee Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Milwaukee Plant averages 6.2 TCR (189% of the Boxed beef produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Milwaukee Plant TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=5 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Milwaukee Plant falls in its industry

212 Boxed beef produced in slaught establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 13 Boxed beef produced in slaught employers in Wisconsin.

Milwaukee Plant (167 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Milwaukee Plant
Milwaukee Plant (167 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Milwaukee Plant has fewer employees than the Boxed beef produced in slaughtering plan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.8 3 0 0
2023 5.0 1.4 14 0 0
2022 14.9 3.1 24 0 0
2021 7.7 1.5 10 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 10.4 9.2 14 4 0
2017 7.3 4.5 9 4 0
2016 7.0 4.9 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · WI · Milwaukee

212 Boxed beef produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CS Beef Packers 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zweigle's 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Darling Ingredients: Bellevue 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smithfield Foods, Inc 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elmroad Generating Station 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pewaukee Data Center 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monarch Paving 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE MP Systems, Inc. 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Irwin Seating Company - Telescopic Division 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR California Science Center (State) 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR UIC Construction 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kellwood Company 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DPS2 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DLV7 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennyson Electric LLC. 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arc Allegany-Steuben- Industrial Park 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.