Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing · Texas

MineARC Systems America

Dallas, TX · ~23 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MineARC Systems America runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

MineARC Systems America: 7.3 TCR = 220% of Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MineARC Systems America safety composite

MineARC Systems America scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 23.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

MineARC Systems America: 0.0 → 23.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 23.1 TCR · DART/TCR 3.19× in 2021

MineARC Systems America's TCR rose 23.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 23.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 3.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333131 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 220% of ind

  • DART 23.1 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO TerraSource Global_IL
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TerraSource Global_IL (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

MineARC Systems America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MineARC Systems America averages 7.3 TCR (220% of the Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MineARC Systems America TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=23.1 · BLS 3.3

Where MineARC Systems America falls in its industry

105 Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgi establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgi employers in Texas.

MineARC Systems America (23 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate MineARC Systems America
MineARC Systems America (23 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3

MineARC Systems America has fewer employees than the Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 23.1 23.1 0 5 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.4 9.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333131 · TX · Dallas

105 Amalgamators (i.e., metallurgical and mining machinery) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TerraSource Global_IL 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Townley Engineering and Manufacturing 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee Store 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Akkerman Inc 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Schreiter Ready Mix 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McRae Industries Footwear Finishing / Shipping 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sartori Whey 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pan American Body Shop - Fremont 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wireless Infrastructure Services 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryerson - Jacksonville 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE XXL DBA McKenzie/Taylor Construction 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE V1-Chesapeake 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.