Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · Texas

Miner Overhead Door Houston

Houston, TX · ~35 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Miner Overhead Door Houston runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Miner Overhead Door Houston: 2.9 TCR = 104% of Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Miner Overhead Door Houston safety composite

Miner Overhead Door Houston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2019

Miner Overhead Door Houston injury rate improved

Miner Overhead Door Houston's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.8 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 104% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #63/97
  • PHOTO D29 Buffalo
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D29 Buffalo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Miner Overhead Door Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Miner Overhead Door Houston averages 2.9 TCR (104% of the Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Miner Overhead Door Houston TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Miner Overhead Door Houston falls in its industry

1,138 Overhead door, commercial- or establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 97 Overhead door, commercial- or employers in Texas.

Miner Overhead Door Houston (35 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Miner Overhead Door Houston
Miner Overhead Door Houston (35 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Miner Overhead Door Houston has fewer employees than the Overhead door, commercial- or industrial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · TX · Houston

1,138 Overhead door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D29 Buffalo 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pevco Systems International 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indiana Industrial Whitestown 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 450-Omaha 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Line Polymers--Clarion 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Alside Window Company - Southeast 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin General Hospital 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR YES Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Shoals 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Markarian Family L.P. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bearon Manufacturing Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hershey Nursery 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.