Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard · Ohio

Minerva Tube Plant

Minerva, OH · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minerva Tube Plant runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Minerva Tube Plant: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minerva Tube Plant safety composite

Minerva Tube Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Minerva Tube Plant held a steady TCR band

Minerva Tube Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Minerva, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Caraustar Industrial…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Caraustar Industrial and Consumer Products Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Minerva Tube Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minerva Tube Plant averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minerva Tube Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Minerva Tube Plant falls in its industry

140 Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfib establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfib employers in Ohio.

Minerva Tube Plant (30 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Minerva Tube Plant
Minerva Tube Plant (30 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Minerva Tube Plant has fewer employees than the Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · OH · Minerva

140 Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 19 employers in Minerva, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Caraustar Industrial and Consumer Products Group 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greif Inc. (Bay Minette Tube Plant) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Mailing Tube Co. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraustar Okemah, OK 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tuente Farms Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 3 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 6 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Hatchery 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCC Airfoils 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minerva Manufacturing Facility 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summitville Tiles, Inc. 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kishman's IGA 101 FTE
NAT-TCR Roche Molecular Solutions (Warehouse) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Power- MN 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips and Jordan, Inc./ Lower Bois D'Arc Dam Project 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SABIC Ottawa, IL Site 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE delfort Printing Services 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Energy Resources, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Process Displays LLC - Alpha 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harvard Maintenenace Inc of Maine 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.