Religious organizations · Minnesota

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light

Minneapolis, MN · ~89 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Religious organizations workplace, earning a grade F.

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light: 5.2 TCR = 247% of Religious organizations BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light safety composite

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2024

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light injury rate improved

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.9 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.9 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=10.0 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813110 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.2 · 247% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #17/28
  • PHOTO Immaculate Heart of …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Immaculate Heart of Mary (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light averages 5.2 TCR (247% of the Religious organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light TCR series: 2018=3.9 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=4 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=10 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light falls in its industry

70 Religious organizations establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 28 Religious organizations employers in Minnesota.

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light (89 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light
Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light (89 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Minneapolis Mn Harbor Light has fewer employees than the Religious organizations median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 6.1 3.7 5 0 0
2022 10.0 8.5 2 5 0
2021 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2020 4.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 7.1 2.4 6 0 0
2018 3.9 1.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813110 · MN · Minneapolis

70 Religious organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Immaculate Heart of Mary 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Gabriels Administration Building 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR St Hubert Catholic Community 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Our Lady of Fatima- Day Programs 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ti-Zack Concrete, LLC 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Glass Company - HQ 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allweather Roof 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Quality Traffic Control, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Yuba City Unified School District 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Greer Steel 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gerdan Slipforming, Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 50055 - CAPSTONE HOME DEPOT Mira Loma CA 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sealed Air 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trenton Forging Company 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dove Canyon Golf Club 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.