Airports, civil, operation and maintenance · Minnesota

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP

Minneapolis, MN · ~295 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Airports, civil, operation and maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP: 9.4 TCR = 208% of Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP safety composite

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2019→2020

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP injury rate improved

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP's TCR fell 9.5 from 14.1 in 2019 to 4.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=14.1 · 2020=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 208% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #23/28
  • PHOTO SATCX0UPS SAT - UPS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~295 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SATCX0UPS SAT - UPS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP averages 9.4 TCR (208% of the Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP TCR series: 2019=14.1 · 2020=4.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP falls in its industry

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 28 Airports, civil, operation and employers in Minnesota.

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP (295 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP
Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP (295 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport - MSP has more employees than the Airports, civil, operation and maintenan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.6 4.2 11 0 0
2019 14.1 14.1 53 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · MN · Minneapolis

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SATCX0UPS SAT - UPS 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swissport Ground Handling - GRR - GRR-GHA 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4833-66131 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6957-ROC 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Menasha Packaging Company - Lakeville 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE IKEA #212 Bloomington 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5977 295 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friendship Village of Bloomington 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Bayshore Community Medical Center 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR OCSD James A. Musick Facility 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chesapeake Health and Rehabilitation Center 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR BBH 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CCSF, Department of Building Inspection 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Gilroy 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.W. Clyde & Co. 295 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer Store 251 295 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.