Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services · Minnesota

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp)

Minneapolis, MN · ~361 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services workplace, earning a grade F.

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp): 11.0 TCR = 244% of Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) safety composite

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp): 9.1 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 12.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2018

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp)'s TCR rose 1.7 from 9.1 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 244% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO SPECTRA JET, INCORPO…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~361 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPECTRA JET, INCORPORATED (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) averages 11.0 TCR (244% of the Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=12.9 · 2018=10.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) falls in its industry

992 Aircraft Maintenance and Repai establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Aircraft Maintenance and Repai employers in Minnesota.

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) (361 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp)
Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) (361 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Minneapolis - St. Paul Airport (Mnmtp) has more employees than the Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.8 5.1 15 2 0
2017 12.9 3.4 15 4 0
2016 9.1 4.9 10 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MN · Minneapolis

992 Aircraft Maintenance and Repair Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPECTRA JET, INCORPORATED 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9215-ATLSKY 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAX-220 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support GRR MRO 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 1757 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE Episcopal Church Home 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE Financial Services 361 FTE
STATE-SIZE MyPillow, Inc., Building #7 360 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Franklin Park Hub (Ilfra) 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Zoresco Equipment Company 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain View Nursing & Rehab 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tymetal Corp. NY Plant 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Britain Hand Tools 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mannington US LVT 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poet LLC 361 FTE
NAT-SIZE MMR Office HQ 361 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.