Correctional institutions · Minnesota

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes

Lino Lakes, MN · ~516 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Correctional institutions workplace, earning a grade B.

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Correctional institutions BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes safety composite

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2017→2019

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes injury rate improved

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.1 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Lino Lakes, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #4/32
  • PHOTO Brookln Correctional…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~516 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookln Correctional Institution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Correctional institutions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes falls in its industry

482 Correctional institutions establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 32 Correctional institutions employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes (516 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes
Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes (516 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Minnesota Correctional Facility, Lino Lakes has more employees than the Correctional institutions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.6 2.0 9 1 0
2018 2.1 1.3 7 1 0
2017 3.1 3.1 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MN · Lino Lakes

482 Correctional institutions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 42 employers in Lino Lakes, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookln Correctional Institution 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augusta Correctional Center 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Corrections (33) 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Corrections (27) 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barrel O'Fun SNack Foods Co., LLC 516 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dura Supreme 516 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bachman's Lyndale 516 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2229 - St Paul Midway 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA in Lino Lakes 5,690 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCF - Lino Lakes 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1448 - Lino Lakes 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molin Concrete Products Inc 252 FTE
NAT-TCR 801 16th st 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cymer - Dayton 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock Materials Coppell 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR I. E. Electric 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memphis Area Transit 516 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrah'S Reno Hotel & Casino 516 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beacon Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Ltd 516 FTE
NAT-SIZE 975 Kansas, Memphis Plant 516 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.