Mental health facilities, residential · Minnesota

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings

Hastings, MN · ~156 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mental health facilities, residential workplace, earning a grade D.

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings: 5.3 TCR = 139% of Mental health facilities, residential BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings safety composite

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.8

2017→2022

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings injury rate improved

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings's TCR fell 10.8 from 13.3 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.3 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Hastings, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 139% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #32/75
  • PHOTO Berkeley Cottage
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Berkeley Cottage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings averages 5.3 TCR (139% of the Mental health facilities, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings TCR series: 2017=13.3 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings falls in its industry

1,165 Mental health facilities, resi establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 75 Mental health facilities, resi employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings (156 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings
Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings (156 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Minnesota Veterans Home-Hastings has more employees than the Mental health facilities, residential median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 2.5 1 1 0
2021 6.9 2.3 6 0 0
2020 4.4 2.2 3 1 0
2019 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2018 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2017 13.3 6.6 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MN · Hastings

1,165 Mental health facilities, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 72 employers in Hastings, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Berkeley Cottage 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR VTC Pomona 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fresh Start 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quakertown House 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SeaChange Printing & Marketing Services, LLC 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE MME Group Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plastic Products Co., Inc. - Lindstrom, MN 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wabash Little Falls 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dakota County 2,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regina Hospital (United Hastings Regina) 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR 610 AFTON ALPS 449 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regina Hospital 389 FTE
NAT-TCR HG1010 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Botanical Designs, LLC Seattle 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HG732 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0035-0035-02713 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schick Manufacturing Inc. - Knoxville 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-UT 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandon Lewis Orchards, Inc 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE SuperMax Caguas 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.