Distribution of electric power · Georgia

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr

Atlanta, GA · ~75 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr: 1.9 TCR = 158% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr safety composite

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr: 2.7 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2022

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr's TCR rose 1.3 from 2.7 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 158% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #22/149
  • PHOTO GMP General Service …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GMP General Service Center - Middlebury (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr averages 1.9 TCR (158% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=4 · BLS 1.2

Where Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 149 Distribution of electric power employers in Georgia.

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr (75 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr
Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr (75 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Minola Operating - 5215 Minola Dr has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.0 2.7 3 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Atlanta

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GMP General Service Center - Middlebury 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arkansas Valley Electric Cooperative 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Western N - IL Electric Ops 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pomeroy Svc Bldg 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bilfinger Industrial Services 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE VENTURE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - NORCROSS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE INSUL-CON INC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE SSP 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR 4261 Corona CA Container 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4503 Florence Mill 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5825 Houston TX 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5831 Detroit MI 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corporation (Murfreesboro) 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE FARM 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4647 Battle Creek Container 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1915-MN37 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.