Skilled nursing facilities · Florida

Mission Health Communities

Tampa, FL · ~71 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Health Communities runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Mission Health Communities: 1.1 TCR = 16% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Health Communities safety composite

Mission Health Communities scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

Mission Health Communities injury rate improved

Mission Health Communities's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.4 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/809
  • PHOTO LONOKE HEALTH AND RE…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LONOKE HEALTH AND REHAB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Mission Health Communities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Health Communities averages 1.1 TCR (16% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Mission Health Communities TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Mission Health Communities falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 809 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Florida.

Mission Health Communities (71 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Health Communities
Mission Health Communities (71 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mission Health Communities has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 0 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 1
2017 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Tampa

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LONOKE HEALTH AND REHAB 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR W III, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dawson Springs Health and Rehab 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rivers Edge Nursing and Rehabilitation 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE On Top Delivery LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCP- (BECA) Bailes Early Childhood Academy 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE PORT SAINT LUCIE MIDPORT_1438807 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Diamond Logistics - Lakeland 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Quintech Electronics and Communications, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Life Connection of Ohio 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NEWNAN 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rickenbacker 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Superior Communications - Corp 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Embassy Suites Kapolei 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taqueria El Milagro 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klover SEPA Inc. (Prefab Division) 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.