Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Nevada

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation

North Las Vegas, NV · ~298 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation: 2.6 TCR = 39% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation safety composite

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2023→2024

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.1 in 2023 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.1 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · North Las Vegas, NV AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.6 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/64
  • PHOTO Citrus Valley Hospice
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~298 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Citrus Valley Hospice (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation averages 2.6 TCR (39% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation TCR series: 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 64 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Nevada.

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation (298 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation
Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation (298 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mission Pines Nursing & Rehabilitation has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.0 8 0 0
2023 5.1 4.0 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NV · North Las Vegas

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 257 employers in North Las Vegas, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Citrus Valley Hospice 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cypress Care Center 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Azalea Health & Rehabilitation 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAI dba Hawthorne Inn of Danville 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fire Station #82 & Fire Training Center 298 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4021-A902 297 FTE
STATE-SIZE LAS 300 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1648 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LAS7 3,903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LAS2 3,721 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LAS7 3,625 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LAS2 2,339 FTE
NAT-TCR Win-Con Enterprises Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bluford Jackson & Son, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockford Il Sales Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TJX Digital Memphis Merchants, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Capet - Petaluma 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intermountain Nutrition 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coltene/Whaledent, Inc. 298 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shultz Steel LLC 298 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.