Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Missouri

Missouri General Maintenance-Est

Princeton, MO · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Missouri General Maintenance-Est runs at 425% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Missouri General Maintenance-Est: 8.9 TCR = 425% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Missouri General Maintenance-Est safety composite

Missouri General Maintenance-Est scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.9

2022→2023

Missouri General Maintenance-Est injury rate improved

Missouri General Maintenance-Est's TCR fell 17.9 from 17.9 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=17.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Princeton, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 425% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #58/61
  • PHOTO Pennsauken Branch
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pennsauken Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Missouri General Maintenance-Est in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Missouri General Maintenance-Est averages 8.9 TCR (425% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Missouri General Maintenance-Est TCR series: 2022=17.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Missouri General Maintenance-Est falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 61 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Missouri.

Missouri General Maintenance-Est (22 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Missouri General Maintenance-Est
Missouri General Maintenance-Est (22 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Missouri General Maintenance-Est has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 17.9 13.4 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MO · Princeton

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 6 employers in Princeton, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pennsauken Branch 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alta Enterprises LLC- Wallingford 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vincent Electric Company 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coolsys CRM Madison 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turkey Hill Farms, LLC. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAYTAN FARROWING 47117 -EST 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE TERRE HAUTE SOW #6 & #2 -EST 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chariton Pork 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pearl's II Eden for Elders 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2662-3032 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRINCETON CONTRACT PRODUCTION 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRINCETON TRANSPORTATION -EST 28 FTE
NAT-TCR Farming2 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Springdale 275 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Grove of Berwyn 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eclipse Advantage - HDJIL - Joliet, IL 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maple Hill Sow 2745 -Est 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCRT3 Alexandria Tenant LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCRT Abilene 2 Tenant LLC 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCR New Haven Tenant LLC 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.