Distribution of electric power · South Dakota

Mitchell Office and Warehouse

Mitchell, SD · ~45 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitchell Office and Warehouse runs at 546% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Mitchell Office and Warehouse: 6.5 TCR = 546% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitchell Office and Warehouse safety composite

Mitchell Office and Warehouse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2019→2024

Mitchell Office and Warehouse injury rate improved

Mitchell Office and Warehouse's TCR fell 2.6 from 5.0 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.0 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Mitchell, SD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 546% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/17
  • PHOTO Manchester Operating…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manchester Operating 524 Atlantic Street Manchester GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Mitchell Office and Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitchell Office and Warehouse averages 6.5 TCR (546% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitchell Office and Warehouse TCR series: 2019=5 · 2020=17.4 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Mitchell Office and Warehouse falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 17 Distribution of electric power employers in South Dakota.

Mitchell Office and Warehouse (45 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitchell Office and Warehouse
Mitchell Office and Warehouse (45 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Mitchell Office and Warehouse has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2021 7.4 7.4 3 0 0
2020 17.4 12.4 3 4 0
2019 5.0 5.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · SD · Mitchell

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 72 employers in Mitchell, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manchester Operating 524 Atlantic Street Manchester GA 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SANTA ROSA SERVICE CENTER 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elk River Municipal Utilities 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Iowa Light and Power Cooperative 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pierre 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mills Construction Inc 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jans Corporation 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE TLMV, Inc 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avera Queen of Peace Hospital 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR TKI Mitchell 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR TKI Mitchell West 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Muth Electric, Inc. 318 FTE
NAT-TCR San Luis Obispo CA FXFE-SLO 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR EPC- Bethlehem 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 0731 - Highland 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Runnings of Hinsdale 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE EaglePicher Technologies - B Street 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7277 North Haggerty Rd Canton MI 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFE Ocheyedan Feed Mill 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE CC&F Retail, Inc (dba Coffee Cup #5) 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.