General warehousing and storage · California

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation

Torrance, CA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation: 0.7 TCR = 13% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation safety composite

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation held a steady TCR band

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Torrance, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/1131
  • PHOTO Rinchem Company - CS…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rinchem Company - CSC 14 Chandler (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation averages 0.7 TCR (13% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation (64 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation
Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation (64 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Mitsubishi Logistics America Corporation has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Torrance

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in Torrance, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rinchem Company - CSC 14 Chandler 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nestle DC Fort Worth 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx Supply Chain Crayola 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mohawk Industries: Flower Mount TX WHS #TXB 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDERA 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGS FARM LABOR CORPORATION 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arroyo Seco Vineyards, Inc 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harbor-UCLA Medical Center 4,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Torrance Memorial Medical Center 3,808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 494 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR World Class Distribution Daytona Hub 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Automated Logic Controls (Pennsylvania) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fireye, Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR D.R. Anderson Constructors 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aircraft Precision Products, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astoria Place of Clyde, LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE DSS025 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carrier Commercial Services (New York) 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.