Commercial building construction general contractors · Nevada

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.

Las Vegas, NV · ~152 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.: 5.8 TCR = 201% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. safety composite

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.: 2.8 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.22× in 2021

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.5 from 2.8 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Las Vegas, NV ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.8 · 201% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #48/59
  • PHOTO Beck & Hofer Constru…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 114 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beck & Hofer Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. averages 5.8 TCR (201% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=3.3 · BLS 2.9

Where M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 59 Commercial building constructi employers in Nevada.

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. (152 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate M.J. Dean Construction, Inc.
M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. (152 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

M.J. Dean Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.3 1.3 13 0 0
2020 5.3 1.5 29 0 0
2019 8.2 1.5 43 1 0
2018 9.2 1.8 25 0 0
2017 6.1 2.0 3 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NV · Las Vegas

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 2,247 employers in Las Vegas, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beck & Hofer Construction 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trumbull-Nelson Construction Company 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cope Closets Concepts 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Hood - 1610 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zazzle 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enterprise 5423 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACCO Engineered Systems - Sparks 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Las Vegas Peach, LLC - Las Vegas 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wynn Las Vegas 12,830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Venetian Casino Resort, LLC 8,538 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Las Vegas 8,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bellagio llc 6,383 FTE
NAT-TCR Presque Isle Store 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Health VNS 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberty Pultrusions 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Monica Health Care Center 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Control Point Associates, Inc. 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gardner Inc. 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAI 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dennis Paper & Food Service 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.