Farm labor contractors · California

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc

Mcfarland, CA · ~315 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Farm labor contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc: 1.2 TCR = 26% of Farm labor contractors BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc safety composite

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc held a steady TCR band

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Mcfarland, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/620
  • PHOTO Growers Farm Managem…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~315 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Growers Farm Management Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc averages 1.2 TCR (26% of the Farm labor contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=1 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 4.5

Where M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc falls in its industry

836 Farm labor contractors establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 620 Farm labor contractors employers in California.

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc (315 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc
M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc (315 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc has more employees than the Farm labor contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2022 2.4 1.2 6 0 0
2021 2.6 0.0 6 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2019 1.0 0.0 4 0 0
2018 0.7 0.0 0 3 0
2017 0.7 0.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Mcfarland

836 Farm labor contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mcfarland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Growers Farm Management Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Land FLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ESTRADA'S AG SERVICES, INC. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEL VALLE FARM LABOR SERVICES INC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Live Oak Farms 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 313 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 308 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 314 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR DURAN CONTRACTING INC 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR PULIDO FARMS INC 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR FELIX LABOR CONTRACTING, INC 921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenview Farming. Inc 389 FTE
NAT-TCR Xigent 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR GCS Odessa 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenosha Racine 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR McDaniel's Construction Corp., Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE UMCasaAntigua958 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mountain College 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixie Landscape Co., Inc. 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kpr Us, LLC 315 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.