Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Georgia

MLW - Pooler -A

Pooler, GA · ~72 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MLW - Pooler -A runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade B.

MLW - Pooler -A: 3.5 TCR = 61% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MLW - Pooler -A safety composite

MLW - Pooler -A scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2018→2024

MLW - Pooler -A injury rate improved

MLW - Pooler -A's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.9 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Pooler, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.5 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #315/506
  • PHOTO Prime Now LLC - UWA2
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prime Now LLC - UWA2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

MLW - Pooler -A in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MLW - Pooler -A averages 3.5 TCR (61% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MLW - Pooler -A TCR series: 2018=2.9 · 2019=7 · 2020=4 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where MLW - Pooler -A falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #315 safest of 506 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Georgia.

MLW - Pooler -A (72 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate MLW - Pooler -A
MLW - Pooler -A (72 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

MLW - Pooler -A has fewer employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2020 4.0 0.8 4 1 0
2019 7.0 2.8 5 0 0
2018 2.9 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Pooler

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 80 employers in Pooler, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - UWA2 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Muncy 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 01009200-00W024 BRADFORD AIRPORT LOGISTICS, LTD-BRADFORD AIRPORT LOGISTICS, LTD 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10810250 REGIONAL SUPPLY CENTER 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pond Constructors, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shallowford Operating - 4404 North Shallowford Rd. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Operating and Transmission Maintenance Center 3951 and 3915 Community Rd 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida City Gas 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV4 2,227 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-WSNC 799 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV7 729 FTE
CITY-NEAR JCB INC 683 FTE
NAT-TCR Designcraft, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Tag & Label 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Giant 406 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CRM of America LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE BOXit Corp. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE King-Lar Company 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0089 Mesa 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0085 Glendale 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.