Electrical work · North Carolina

M&M Electric Service, Inc

Gastonia, NC · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

M&M Electric Service, Inc runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electrical work workplace, earning a grade B.

M&M Electric Service, Inc: 2.1 TCR = 77% of Electrical work BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

M&M Electric Service, Inc safety composite

M&M Electric Service, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2024

M&M Electric Service, Inc injury rate improved

M&M Electric Service, Inc's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Gastonia, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #55/108
  • PHOTO Excel Services, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Excel Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

M&M Electric Service, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows M&M Electric Service, Inc averages 2.1 TCR (77% of the Electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

M&M Electric Service, Inc TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where M&M Electric Service, Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical work establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 108 Electrical work employers in North Carolina.

M&M Electric Service, Inc (39 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate M&M Electric Service, Inc
M&M Electric Service, Inc (39 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

M&M Electric Service, Inc has fewer employees than the Electrical work median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 6.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 2.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NC · Gastonia

4,550 Electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 182 employers in Gastonia, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Excel Services, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bergelectric Corp. FL 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williamsport Electric Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TransCore - T0089 - Miramar 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE B & S Farming, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jeffery C Lee Farms, INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sullivan Farms Inc. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston Memorial Hospital, Incorporated d/b/a CaroMont Regional Medical Center 3,156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston County Government 1,711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wix Allen Plant 931 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gastonia Components and Logistics - Tulip 912 FTE
NAT-TCR Eagle Excavation 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Spaulding Rehab Hospital F N 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonnette, Page & Stone Corp. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shawano agronomy/grain 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Beckman and Gast Co. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialty Coating Systems Amherst 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE BCI Exteriors, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterbilt of Louisiana LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.