Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul

St Paul, MN · ~65 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul: 1.1 TCR = 30% of Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul safety composite

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2022

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul injury rate improved

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · St Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/419
  • PHOTO Twin Cities Orthoped…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Twin Cities Orthopedics - Burnsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul averages 1.1 TCR (30% of the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul falls in its industry

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices ( establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 419 Gastroenterologists' offices ( employers in Minnesota.

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul (65 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul
Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul (65 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Mn Gastro Endoscopy Center St Paul has more employees than the Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., cent median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · St Paul

2,836 Gastroenterologists' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Twin Cities Orthopedics - Burnsville 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulsa Bone & Joint Associates 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Oncology - Burnsville 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Medical Foundation (185-256) 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Prairie 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hibbing Public Utilities 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Virginia Public Utilities 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Utility Services Inc-MN-Lakeville 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Ontario International Airport Authority 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New Columbia 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Benton-Georgia LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR High Point Admin Unit / Vocational Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG233 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 548068-Spo-Shadle/Garland Sta 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 407264-Roseburg Po 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 140500-Ewa Beach Po 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.