Cable and Other Subscription Programming · Minnesota

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle

Minneapolis, MN · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle runs at 1290% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable and Other Subscription Programming workplace, earning a grade F.

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle: 9.0 TCR = 1290% of Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle safety composite

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2022→2023

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle injury rate improved

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle's TCR fell 2.6 from 10.3 in 2022 to 7.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.3 · 2023=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 1290% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO CA_Los Angeles_6314 …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA_Los Angeles_6314 Arizona Place_CCLA0008 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle averages 9.0 TCR (1290% of the Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle TCR series: 2022=10.3 · 2023=7.7 · BLS 0.7

Where MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle falls in its industry

455 Cable and Other Subscription P establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Cable and Other Subscription P employers in Minnesota.

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle (61 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle
MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle (61 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

MN - Minneapolis, 6301 Cecilia Circle has fewer employees than the Cable and Other Subscription Programming median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.7 7.7 4 0 0
2022 10.3 10.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · MN · Minneapolis

455 Cable and Other Subscription Programming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA_Los Angeles_6314 Arizona Place_CCLA0008 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MD - Westminster, 46 Kate Wagner Rd 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL - Orange Park, 357 College Dr 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MI - Chesterfield, 30036 Commerce Blvd 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gittleman Construction and Maintenance 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE R and G Construction Co. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE BLK ELECTRIC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cresco Food Technologies 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR M7905 Charlotte Hun 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-004-Litchfield ( RK-004 ) 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #927 (MARKET STREET) 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Food 4 Less - San Luis Obispo 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mittera - Reno 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wonton Food Inc Bean Sprout Plainview 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE MASCOT (Knoxville), TN 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE N Baltimore 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.