Electric Power Distribution · Alabama

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex

Mobile, AL · ~106 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade C.

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex: 1.2 TCR = 101% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex safety composite

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.04× in 2021

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 2.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Mobile, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.2 · 101% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #11/138
  • PHOTO Lapeer Service Center
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lapeer Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex averages 1.2 TCR (101% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 138 Electric Power Distribution employers in Alabama.

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex (106 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex
Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex (106 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Mobile Division Michigan Avenue Complex has more employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AL · Mobile

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lapeer Service Center 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little River Electric Cooperative, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR JASPER NEWTON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountain Electric Coop 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dudley Lumber Company 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE IKO Southeast 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highline Warren Southeast 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daniels Iron 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR DATTCO - New Hartford 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JW Powerline LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Peco Farms Live Haul 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartwood Healthcare 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willow Creek Retirement Center 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy At Home 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stratford Recreation Department 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Cary Company 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.