Asphalt paving blocks made from purchased asphaltic materials · California

Mobile Equipment

Sacramento, CA · ~131 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mobile Equipment runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Asphalt paving blocks made from purchased asphaltic materials workplace, earning a grade A.

Mobile Equipment: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Asphalt paving blocks made from purchased asphaltic materials BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mobile Equipment safety composite

Mobile Equipment scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2024

Mobile Equipment injury rate improved

Mobile Equipment's TCR fell 3.4 from 4.0 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 324121 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO METRO MATERIALS
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: METRO MATERIALS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mobile Equipment in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mobile Equipment averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Asphalt paving blocks made from purchased asphaltic materials BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mobile Equipment TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Mobile Equipment falls in its industry

131 Asphalt paving blocks made fro establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Asphalt paving blocks made fro employers in California.

Mobile Equipment (131 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Mobile Equipment
Mobile Equipment (131 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Mobile Equipment has more employees than the Asphalt paving blocks made from purchase median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

324121 · CA · Sacramento

131 Asphalt paving blocks made from purchased asphaltic materials employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR METRO MATERIALS 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ajax Materials Corporation 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crafco, Inc. - Cheyenne 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinitas Materials, LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Babe Blosser Ranch 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dave Wilson Nursery 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Flora Corp 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Land FLC 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Evoqua Water Technologies 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 290 - Indianapolis Keystone 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Snyder Services 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Berger Marine, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coastal Greenhouses, LLC -NJ 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Purcell P&C LLC. 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raymondville 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGI Communications, LLC 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.