Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, inspection) manufacturing · Michigan

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components

Byron Center, MI · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, inspection) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components: 3.6 TCR = 110% of Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, inspection) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components safety composite

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components: 2.9 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.23× in 2024

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components's TCR rose 1.5 from 2.9 in 2022 to 4.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Byron Center, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 110% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #62/131
  • PHOTO Axis Engineering
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Axis Engineering (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Model Pattern Company dba MP Components averages 3.6 TCR (110% of the Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, inspection) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components TCR series: 2022=2.9 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Model Pattern Company dba MP Components falls in its industry

387 Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 131 Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, employers in Michigan.

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components (29 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Model Pattern Company dba MP Components
Model Pattern Company dba MP Components (29 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Model Pattern Company dba MP Components has fewer employees than the Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, inspectio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2023 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Byron Center

387 Jigs (e.g., checking, gauging, inspection) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 78 employers in Byron Center, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Axis Engineering 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tool Specialties Company, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safe Fleet 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TOOL TECH, LLC 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (IN) 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co. Hart 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Riveridge Cider 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Covert Generating Company 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buist Electric 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lumbermen's Inc. Byron Center 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masterpiece Flower Company LLC 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Van Eerden Trucking 254 FTE
NAT-TCR Dover Hydraulics 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin MRO 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Stonebrook Convalescent Center, INC. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Harr Toyota 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thermo CIDTEC Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breeder Division Field Office 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamondback Barrels 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Color Solutions, Inc. 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.