Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Indiana

Modern Materials, Inc.

Rochester, IN · ~120 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Modern Materials, Inc. runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Modern Materials, Inc.: 6.9 TCR = 210% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Modern Materials, Inc. safety composite

Modern Materials, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Modern Materials, Inc.: 0.0 → 16.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 56.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.94× in 2024

Modern Materials, Inc.'s TCR rose 16.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 16.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 56.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Rochester, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 210% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #20/32
  • PHOTO Para Tech Coating - …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Para Tech Coating - 60-3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Modern Materials, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Modern Materials, Inc. averages 6.9 TCR (210% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Modern Materials, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=56.7 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=16.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Modern Materials, Inc. falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 32 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Indiana.

Modern Materials, Inc. (120 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Modern Materials, Inc.
Modern Materials, Inc. (120 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Modern Materials, Inc. has more employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.2 6.5 5 0 0
2023 8.3 4.1 4 0 0
2022 9.4 3.1 3 0 0
2021 56.7 24.3 13 1 0
2020 11.6 11.6 3 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · IN · Rochester

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 34 employers in Rochester, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Para Tech Coating - 60-3 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vorteq Coil Finishers Oconomowoc 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR All-Color Powder Coating 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Etched Metal Company 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heartland Growers, Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Plymouth PLY1 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE MGPI of Indiana, LLC 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cenveo Worldwide Limited Indianapolis 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woodlawn Hospital 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Metal Products 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Community School Corp 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lau- Rochester 204 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant 108 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MO Routes LLC 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Agri Supply of Valdosta 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington Medical Investors LLC dba Life Care Center of Burlington 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant 349 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 304 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 239 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Torklift International Inc 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.