Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing · Massachusetts

Modern Mold and Tool Inc.

Pittsfield, MA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Modern Mold and Tool Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 34% of Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. safety composite

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2023

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. injury rate improved

Modern Mold and Tool Inc.'s TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=1.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333511 · Pittsfield, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO RL Hudson and Company
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RL Hudson and Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Modern Mold and Tool Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (34% of the Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=1.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Modern Mold and Tool Inc. falls in its industry

216 Molds for plastics and rubber establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Molds for plastics and rubber employers in Massachusetts.

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. (64 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Modern Mold and Tool Inc.
Modern Mold and Tool Inc. (64 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Modern Mold and Tool Inc. has more employees than the Molds for plastics and rubber working ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2016 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333511 · MA · Pittsfield

216 Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 94 employers in Pittsfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RL Hudson and Company 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR YJI KING MACHINE OF SOUTH CAROLINA LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seaway Plastics Engineering LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Office & Offsite 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE System 7 Wolfers, Inc.-Beverly Office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE kleeberg Mechanical Services LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE William F. Lynch Co., Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Transfer & Storage, Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springside Rehabilitation & Skilled Care Center 3,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMAPF01 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berkshire County Arc, Inc. 705 FTE
CITY-NEAR HMAPFB1 572 FTE
NAT-TCR Hunter Roberts Construction Group - Corporate 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Producers Supply Co. Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 55 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Yeast Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lotz Trucking Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE RIG Consulting, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Energy Works 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Askin Construction LLC 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.